DSpace Repository

Modeling stock market return volatility in the presence of structural breaks: Evidence from Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Michere Ndei, Caroline
dc.contributor.author Muchina, Stephen
dc.contributor.author Waweru, Kennedy
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-27T08:21:14Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-27T08:21:14Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Ndei, C. M., Muchina, S., & Waweru, K. (2019). Modeling stock market return volatility in the presence of structural breaks: Evidence from Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 8(5), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v8i5.308 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2147-4478
dc.identifier.uri https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/308
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/659
dc.description A journal article published in the International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science en_US
dc.description.abstract This study sought to model the stock market return volatility at the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) in the presence of structural breaks. Using daily NSE 20 share index for the period 04/01/2010 to 29/12/2017, the market return volatility was modeled using different GARCH type models and taking into account four endogenously identified structural breaks. The market exhibited a non-normal distribution that was leptokurtic and negatively skewed and also showed evidence for ARCH effects, volatility clustering, and volatility persistence. We found that by considering structural breaks, volatility persistence was reduced, while leverage effects were found to lead to explosive volatility. In addition, investors were not rewarded for taking up additional risk since the risk premium was insignificant for the full period. However, during explosive volatility, investors were rewarded for taking up more risk. Moreover, we found that risk premium, leverage effects, and volatility persistence were significantly correlated. The GARCH (1,1) and TGARCH(1,1) models were found to be the best fit models to test for symmetric and asymmetric effects respectively. While the GARCH models were able to provide evidence for the stylized facts in the NSE, we conclude that the presence or absence of these features is period specific. This especially relates to volatility persistence, leverage effects, and risk premium effects. Caution should, therefore, be taken in using a specific GARCH model to forecast market return volatility in Kenya. It is thus imperative to pretest the data before any return volatility forecasting is done. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The Co-operative University of Kenya en_US
dc.subject Modeling Stock Market en_US
dc.subject Return Volatility en_US
dc.subject Structural Breaks en_US
dc.title Modeling stock market return volatility in the presence of structural breaks: Evidence from Nairobi Securities Exchange, Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account